#2 Sharon Fawcett – Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

Posted: January 22, 2011 by sharonfawcett in #2 Zen and Web 2.0

“The stream of national consciousness moves faster now, and it is broader, but it seems to run less deep.” Robert Pirsig wrote these words in 1974. They still ring true thirty-seven years later. Everything—including the way information is transmitted and received—is moving faster, and is “broader.”

The news media began its transformation from being “deep” to becoming “broad” after the end of the Cold War, with the perceived end of the foreign threat against Western nations. In his book, Junk News, American journalist Tom Fenton points out that corporate media owners believed it had become safe to ignore the world, and began shutting down foreign bureaus, laying off foreign correspondents, cutting news-gathering budgets, and “progressively feeding the public a diet that contained more infotainment and lifestyle items and less of what is commonly called hard news” (7). Real news fell by the wayside as news outlets began to seek profits by attracting audiences through entertainment, rather than fulfilling their civic duty to provide the sort of information that informs citizens, generates public debate, and holds governments to account.

News gathering began to die and newspapers were hard hit as the majority of people began to get their news from television networks that offered little substance but loads of images and excitement. Then came the internet, where one could find an unlimited amount of “news” at any time of the day or night. But it’s not the sort of news that existed in the days of Edward R. Murrow, John Hersey, or Walter Cronkite. It’s not the stuff that journalism classes will be reading and studying six decades from now. Unfortunately, the internet has followed in television’s footsteps to be, as Pirsig writes, “an endless parade of trivia and fashion, the silt of tomorrow.”

Several years ago I gave up reading my local newspaper. Stories of feline rescues by firemen served only to aggravate me, when I knew there was a world of information more worthy of the printed page. I tried reading the Globe and Mail for a while, but basically, I’ve been wandering in the wilderness for some time, without a reliable source of informational news. I watch BBC World News on cable television when I can, but it doesn’t seem like enough. I scan the BBC online, but I’m not especially comfortable with the brief stories provided. I prefer journalism that brings understanding, not just superficial awareness. It seems to be a time-consuming task to search for those stories on a day-to-day basis—time that I don’t have at this phase in my life. So, I attempt to keep myself informed on a few key issues that are important to me, through online searches for information and by reading articles in academic journals. In the 21st century, with all of the technology available, it should be easier to stay informed. But I find that because of the technology—which causes media to “move faster” and become “broader” (more shallow)—it’s more difficult to understand the world, the nation, and my own community.

  1. I agree with you that it’s difficult to understand. I just wonder what you find your missing out on because of technology; if it’s the feelings or understandings that you had about those things is now gone, or the fact that it feels like there is nothing substantial within the internet?

    • sharonfawcett says:

      Liz, thank you for reading my post and taking time to comment. Yours is a very good question and I’ve thought about it many times since reading it this morning. I guess what I find troublesome about “technology” is that it has allowed so much irrelevant information to be published/posted/produced. I find it hard to find “news” that’s of much importance. I’m not saying it isn’t out there, I just find it’s cushioned (or smothered) by so much seemingly unimportant stuff. It takes time and effort to sift through the trivial to find something that means anything to me. Remember the Neil Postman quote I used in my presentation in JOUR 4006? “Relevance has become irrelevant.”

      For example, yesterday morning I woke up too late to watch the BBC World News (it’s on at 7:00 a.m.). So, I thought the next best thing for news might be Canada AM. I learned a lesson! I only had about the time it takes to eat my mini shredded wheat and what did Canada AM teach me in that 10-15 minutes? A winery in Canada has broken the Guinness Book record for the largest wine glass filled with the largest quantity of red wine ever. It certainly was a bigger glass than I’ve ever seen but I fail to see why I needed to know about it! Then, one of the hosts (I think he’s the weather guy) did his daily segment on interesting things he learned on the internet that morning. More trivia.

      I know that new technologies—if you know how to use them well—can be
      great, and could probably help me find the news I crave. But I am not yet savvy that way.

      I was encouraged to learn about propublica.org this morning and hope to spend some time reading and watching some of their stories. I guess I just long for the days when there was a reliable news source you could go to and be truly informed. Now, with the transformation of the news to be entertaining, eye-catching, and understood by a fifth-grader, more digging is required to remain informed. And, besides not having the time, I’m kind of lazy sometimes.

      Sorry for the essay-like response. You can’t accuse me of trying to get my message out in 3.5 seconds or less! (Hahaha!)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s